piston написа: ↑15 Окт 2024, 08:24
Ей, малоумник, прочете ли какво пише в скрийншота ти, тъпоглавецо?!?
Това да е хуй, та да ви го намаам, ама е акъл - или го имаш, или не!!!
Как командния пункт ще праща иннформация на ракетата?!? С СМС ли, да ти ЕПМ?!?
Изкушавам се да отговоря по същия каруцарски начин, но се въздържам за да има някакъв смисъл тази дискусия.
Горния ми пост, беше отговор на въпроса ти как се комуникира с ракетата:
линк 16 на ракетата ли е монтиран ? Сентинелът (който пак е радар, о, Геле!) на ракетата ли е говорил или как е станало?!? Дай с 1,2,3,4… Белким те разбера
Отговорът е в цитата - RDFL. Очевидно, AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel е комуникирал с ракетата по RDFL, като и AN/MPQ-53/65/65A го прави, и както е споментато в скрийншота. Ето още детайли от времената на PAC-2(GEM-T):
The missile is command-guided by radar to a
point just prior to intecept. It is at this point that
the unique TVM guidance mode begins.
In the TVM mode, the radar set sends out a
special waveform that illuminates the target.
The radar sends an encoded uplink message to
the missile that commands the missile to open
its receiver for detection of the TVM waveform
energy reflected from the target. The missile
then encodes and sends boresight errors via
downlink message back to the radar. Guidance
computations are then made by the WCC and
sent back through the radar to the missile via
uplink message. This process continues until
intercept. TVM guidance provides greater accu-
racy because its guidance is based on what the
missile sees, in addition to what the radar sees.
Since the missile is closer to the target than the
radar, miss distances are reduced.
от тук:
https://www.bits.de/NRANEU/others/amd-u ... 887%29.pdf
Както писах и rki потвърди, в Украйна има интегриран и работещ IBCS(
https://web.archive.org/web/20240207060 ... 558424.pdf):
Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) integrates
current and future Air and Missile Defense (AMD) sensors
and weapons into a common integrated fire control capability
with a distributed “plug-and-fight” network architecture. The
IAMD Battle Command System (IBCS) is the fire control and
operational center capability that provides greater defense
effectiveness than what can be provided in the current single
sensor fire unit construct. IBCS develops composite tracks
from sensor measurement data provided by each sensor in
the task force and develops weapon firing solutions based
off of the composite track data. This method provides a more
accurate target track, and more weapon battlespace than
current systems can provide. The IBCS provides a common
engagement operations center and data sharing capability for
all echelons of Army AMD.
IBCS was designed to replace eight anti-ballistic missile defense command systems, including Raytheon's Patriot missile engagement control station.
Та на твоето упорство и невъзпитан език отговорът е, че IBCS позволява радари от NASAMS да целеуказват на ракети от Patriot:
Sentinel A4 can be easily integrated with existing defense systems, not only IFPC and NCR-IADS, but also with systems like NASAMS, the Aegis Combat Management System and NORAD, to name a few.
Integrates with Army’s current IBCS and FAADC2
Provides data to C2 systems to leverage critical information to determine the best course of action to address threats
IBCS will “talk” to the Army’s IFPC Increment 2, and as the primary sensor for IFPC, Sentinel A4 will be integral in supporting critical asset protection.
от тук:
https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/pr ... el-a4.htmlпрез последните ГОДИНИ (САМП/Т и НАСАМС
, а че понякога има откровенни глупости съм съгласен.
